https://www.citylab.com/equity/2019/10/supreme-court-inclusionary-zoning-constitutional-takings-clause/596863/
Will the Supreme Court Strike Down Inclusionary Zoning?
(..) Back in 2000, two Marin County property owners,
Dartmond and Esther Cherk, looked to split their undeveloped land into two
single-family-zoned lots. As developers, they were liable to preserve some part
of the property for affordable housing or pay into a low-income housing
production fund. The fee was nearly $40,000; the Cherks sued.
The Marin County case may test the constitutionality
of inclusionary
zoning, a tool that local jurisdictions rely on to expand the supply of
affordable housing, especially in tight housing markets.
(..) Housing advocates and industry associations are filing
briefs on both sides of the case, which could have ramifications for hundreds
of jurisdictions across more than two dozen states where local ordinances
require new residential developments to include affordable housing units.
Opponents of inclusionary zoning—in this case the plaintiffs
and their backers from the Pacific Legal Foundation, a nonprofit that defends
property right and economic liberty—argue that these ordinances violate the
takings clause, a provision of the Fifth Amendment that says that “private
property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.” (..)
2019-10-08